This is the first, introductory part of a short series of posts explaining the meaning of the picture below:
The last part of "Notes on Clifford algebra Cl(2,0)" ended with two one-parameter subgroups of SL(2,R): LT(a) and RT(a). They are left- and right-triangular matrices with1 on the diagonal and parameter a in the lower left (resp. upper right) corner. Cf. Eqs. (47) and (48) in the notes. LT and RT can act on Cl(2) matrices from the left or from the right, with left and right actions commuting.
Now let us collect together several facts.
- Our work area is R2,2 - the Möbius extension of R1,1, where R1,1 is the Minkowski space-time with only one space dimension. The signature of R2,2 is (++--).
- The we restrict our attention to the null cone N in R2,2. It consists of points with coordinates (x1,x2,x3,x4) which satisfy (x1)2 + (x2)2 - (x3)2 - (x4)2 = 0, or (x1)2 + (x2)2 = (x3)2 + (x4)2.
- The note Tuesday Special - Tetractys and Lattice Infinity we have discussed "balanced tetrads:
a2 + b2 = c2 + d2, (a,b,c,d integers), (1)
and the algorithm of generating all of them:
Proposition 1. Every primitive solution of (1) is of the form
a = (mp+nq)/2,
b = (np-mq)/2,
c = (mp-nq)/2,
d = (mq+np)/2,where m,n,p,q are integers. Conversely, for any integers m,n,p,q such that a,b,c,d are integers, the formula above provides a solution of a2 + b2 =c2 + d2.
- Points on N with all four integer coordinates are "balanced tetrads" as in 3.
- Each SL(2,R) transformation induces an SO(2,2) transformation of R2,2, that maps the null cone N into itself.
- SO(2,2)
matrices with integer coefficients map points of N with integer
coefficients to other points of N with integer coefficients.
- Sl(2,R) matrices RT(2a), LT(2a), for a = 1 and a = -1, induce SO(2,2) transformations with integer coefficients.
The last observation follows from the explicit formulas (45) in Notes. Denoting by I2 the 2x2 identity matrix, we have:
For left actions:
Λ(I2, LT(2a)) = {{-1, -a, -a, 0}, {a, -1, 0, -a}, {-a, 0, -1, a}, {0, -a, -a, -1}};
Λ(I2, RT(2a)) = {{-1, a, -a, 0}, {-a, -1, 0, -a}, {-a, 0, -1, -a}, {0, -a, a, -1}};
For right actions:
Λ(LT(2a), I2) = {{-1, -a, a, 0}, {a, -1, 0, -a}, {a, 0, -1, -a}, {0, -a, a, -1}};
Λ(RT(2a), I2) = {{-1, a, a, 0}, {-a, -1, 0, -a}, {a, 0, -1, a}, {0, -a, -a, -1}};
We choose a=1 and a = -1 and obtain altogether 8 SO(2,2) matrices with integer coefficients. We can use these eight matrices to construct an iterated function system on the torus as follows.
Iterated function system (IFS) from eight SO(2,2) matrices.
We have obtained eight SO(2,2) matrices, let us call them M1,...,M8:
M1 = {{1, 1, -1, 0}, {-1, 1, 0, 1}, {-1, 0, 1, 1}, {0, 1, -1, 1}},
M2 = {{1, -1, 1, 0}, {1, 1, 0, -1}, {1, 0, 1, -1}, {0, -1, 1, 1}},
M3 = {{1, -1, -1, 0}, {1, 1, 0, 1}, {-1, 0, 1, -1}, {0, 1, 1, 1}},
M4 = {{1, 1, 1, 0}, {-1, 1, 0, -1}, {1, 0, 1, 1}, {0, -1, -1, 1}},
M5 = {{1, 1, 1, 0}, {-1, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, -1}, {0, 1, 1, 1}},
M6 = {{1, -1, -1, 0}, {1, 1, 0, -1}, {-1, 0, 1, 1}, {0, -1, -1, 1}},
M7 ={{1, -1, 1, 0}, {1, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1}, {0, 1, -1, 1}},
M8 = {{1, 1, -1, 0}, {-1, 1, 0, -1}, {-1, 0, 1, -1}, {0, -1, 1, 1}}.
We can start now the IFS-game. We select an initial point x0 on N with integer coordinates. For instance x0 = (0,1,0,1) is a good candidate. We apply to x0 each of the matrices Mi to obtain 8 new points xi = Mi x0. To each of the new point we apply each of Mi. We obtain 64 points xji = Mjxi. And so on. At step n we obtain 8n points. Each of them is a point on N with integer coordinates, thus defining a "balanced tetrad" of the type a2 + b2 = c2 + d2.
To be continued...

Here is a new episode! After a short break, it's nice to get back to our smart game.
ReplyDeleteBut now I don't understand why the object under study is called 'null CONE' and not a 'null TORUS'?
Another question is why do we need integers? Do we aim at describing spacetime from QUANTUM principles?
N is a cone. Only PN, the projective null cone, becomes a torus. We will come to that in Part II.
DeleteAs for why integers? There are famous Gaussian integers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integer
So, why not on the null cone in R^{2,2}? Perhaps in the future they will also become fomous for one reason or another. On the other hand discrete and/or fractal spacetime is another fascinating possibility!
Ark, I cannot obtain the above Lambda matrices for left actions
ReplyDelete(I2, LT(2a)) and (I2, RT(2a)) and similar for right actions using formulas (45) and (46). There are too many 'minus' signs. For example, I have got that all the diagonal elements of L(LT(2a, I2)) are equal to +1, and not -1. What am I doing wrong?
Noticed a misprint here
"For right actions:"
LT(2, I2) --> LT(2a, I2)
RT(2, I2) --> RT(2a, I2)
Thank you, Anna! My error. I often make silly errors. Very often they are with signs. Should be all better now.
Delete