This post is a continuation of "The Spin Chronicles (Part 5): Exterior algebra of space", and we will keep the notation introduced therein. But first a little historical interlude.
Once upon a time
Once upon a time, in a tiny village
named Space, there lived a girl with a most unusual name: Grassmann
Algebra. Grassmann was as kind-hearted as they came, with a mind as
sharp as a moonlit blade. But her legs, fragile from birth, made every
step she took a challenge, each movement carefully measured and
thoughtful. The villagers knew her well for her patient smile and her
skill in arranging numbers into beautiful patterns, even though she
sometimes longed to dance freely through the fields of Space.
One bright, dewy morning, as Grassmann wandered along the riverbank lost
in thought, she spotted something bobbing gently in the water. Curious,
she waded in and fished out…a pair of strange, shimmering shoes! They
were woven with golden threads that seemed to flicker and vibrate with
energy, and to her amazement, they began to speak.
"I am Symmetric and Non-Degenerate," announced the left shoe, with a self-important air.
The right shoe chimed in immediately, a bit more slyly. "And I am also Non-Degenerate, but distinctly Anti-Symmetric."
Grassmann raised an eyebrow. "Symmetric…Anti-Symmetric? I’ve never heard of shoes with such personality!"
"Just put us on," the left shoe insisted with a twinkle in its eye.
"Your feet are about to become very well acquainted with mathematics."
Though a bit skeptical, Grassmann couldn’t resist. She slipped her feet
into the shoes, and at once, a surge of energy pulsed through her legs.
It was as if the entire fabric of Space itself vibrated with her.
Grassmann stood, and to her amazement, her legs felt strong—perfectly
balanced and coordinated. She took one step, then another, feeling as if
she were part of an elegant, invisible dance that echoed through the
entire village. She was no longer bound by her limitations but was, at
last, fully free.
Unbeknownst to her, these vibrations reached far beyond the village of
Space. In a distant, towering castle overlooking the universe, Prince
Gravity felt the rhythmic pulse of Grassmann's footsteps reverberate
through his bones. The vibrations resonated with him in a way he’d never
felt before. Driven by an inexplicable pull, he set off to find their
source, crossing dimensions and curvatures until he arrived in the
village of Space, drawn to the girl whose steps had shaken his very
core.
When Grassmann and Prince Gravity met, it was as if all the hidden
forces of Space aligned. Gravity extended a hand to her, and together,
they felt balanced, as though neither would fall as long as the other
stood by. Grassmann, no longer bound by any limitation, felt a profound
happiness blossom within her. And so, they decided to be bound in
another way entirely: they would marry.
The marriage was no small event, attracting many peculiar guests from
beyond the realms of Space. Lady Consciousness, a regal figure with an
all-seeing gaze, sat by Sir Light, who occasionally flickered from one
seat to another, always the center of attention. As Grassmann and
Gravity exchanged vows, their presence illuminated all of Space, as if
new stars were born simply to watch.
In time, Grassmann and Gravity had two children. The first, a curious
child they named Matter, was as grounded as Gravity himself. The second,
a mischievous twin they called Anti-Matter, delighted in keeping
everyone on their toes. Together, they completed the family, their lives
a harmonious mix of push and pull, existence and annihilation, symmetry
and difference.
And so, Grassmann Algebra and Prince Gravity, their lives woven by fate,
lived happily ever after in the village of Space, dancing across the
fields, balancing and twirling in perfect harmony, for all of time.
Now that we got an idea of what to expect, we take on the math. The Grassmann algebra Λ(V) of a three-dimensional real vector space V consists of scalars, vectors, bi-vectors , and three-vectors. Its general element is a linear combination of those. We write it as
Λ(V) = Λ0(V)⊕Λ1(V)⊕Λ2(V)⊕Λ3(V),
where "i" in Λi(V) denotes the rank of multi-vectors constituting the subspace Λi(V) of Λ(V).
Suppose now V is endowed with an Euclidean scalar product, denoted u·v. We then endow
Λ(V) itself with scalar product ( | ) as follows:
if f,g are elements of Λ(V) with different ranks, their scalar product (f|g) is, by definition, zero. We set
(1|1) = 1.
If f, g are exterior products of vectors
f = v1∧..∧vi, g = w1∧...∧wi,
then (f|g) is the determinant of the matrix of scalar products of the vectors: (vi·wj). We then extend the scalar product to the whole Λ(V) by linearity.
Danger: It is not at all evident that the above definition (f|g) is mathematically correct i.e. that it does not depend on the representation of f and g as exterior products of vectors. For instance we have
v1∧ v2 = v1∧ (v1+v2).
But it can be shown, nevertheless that the definition is correct.
We can easily verify that if ei is an orthonormal basis in V, then
(e12|e12) = (e23|e23) = (e31|e31) =1,
(e123|e123) = 1,
(e12|e23) = (e23|e31) = (e31|e12) = 0.
Exercise 1. Verify the above formulas.
Therefore 1, e1, e2, e3, e12, e23, e31, e123 form an orthonormal basis in the eight-dimensional vector space Λ(V).
We will use this scalar product on Λ(V) to define a new multiplication, the Clifford algebra multiplication, but first let us introduce the "insertion' (or, some would say "annihilation") operators. For each element φ in Λ(V) we define the linear operator iφ acting on V as the adjoint to the left exterior multiplication by φ:
( iφ ψ|λ) = (ψ|φ∧λ),
for any φ,ψ,λ in Λ(V).
Since the right hand side of the defining formula is linear in φ, the operator iφ is also linear in φ. For the right hand side to be non-zero, and for φ,ψ,λ of definite rank, we must have rank(ψ) = rank(φ)+rank(λ). Thus rank(iφψ) = rank(ψ) - rank(φ), and we see that the action of iφ decreases the rank of a multi-vector by the rank of φ. In particular if rank(φ)>0, we must have iφ 1 = 0.
Exercise 2. What is i1?
Exercise 3. Show that, for any v,w in V, we have iv∘iw + iw∘iv = 0, where "∘" denotes the composition of operators.
Exercise 4. Show that, for every v in V, we have (iv)2 = 0.
If u,v are two vectors in V, then
iuv = ivu = (u·v)1
Let us find a similar explicit formula for acting with iu on bi-vectors. If also v,w,z are in V, then, according to the defining formula, we have
(iu(v∧w)|z) = (v∧w|u∧z) = (u·v)(w·z) - (u·w)(v·z) = ( iu(v)w - iu(w)v |z),
thus, since z was an arbitrary vector in V,
iu(v∧w) = iu(v)w - iu(w)v.
We also see that if u is orthogonal to v and to w, then iu(v∧w) = 0.
Similarly we can obtain
iu(v∧w∧z) = iu(v) w∧z - iu(w)v∧z + iu(z)v∧w.
We say that the operator iu is an anti-derivation.
We are now ready to define a new multiplication in Λ(V). For a,b in Λ(V)
we will denote the new product simply as ab, and it is defined by
ab = a∧b + ia(b).
Λ(V) equipped with this multiplication is called the Clifford (or geometric) algebra of the space V endowed with the scalar product u·v. It is denoted Cl(V).
Thus, in particular, if v,w are vectors in V, we have
vw = v∧w + (v·w)1
Therefore we have
vw + wv = 2 (v·w),
vw - wv = 2 (v∧w).
If v and w are orthogonal, i.e. if v·w = 0, then vw = v∧w = -wv. Orthogonal vectors anti-commute. On the other hand we have that vv = v2 = v·v. Similarly, if u,v,w are mutually orthogonal, then
uvw = u∧v∧w.
Exercise 5. Prove this last formula.
It is not evident that so defined multiplication determines an associative algebra. Therefore let us first calculate the products of our basis vectors 1, e1, e2, e3, e12, e23, e31, e123, assuming ei form an orthonormal basis. Different ei will anti-commute, their squares will be all equal to 1.
We easily find that the multiplication table is much the same as that of the algebra Λ(V) except that the squares of ei are now 1 instead of 0, as they are in Λ(V). Let us consider, in particular, the basic three-vector e123. We calculate its square
e123 e123 = e1e2e3e1e2e3 = (e1)2e2e3e2e3 = e2e3e2e3 = - (e2)2(e3)2 = -1.
Thus our basic three-vectors behaves like the imaginary "i". Notice
that it commutes with all basis elements of the algebra Cl(V),
therefore with all its elements. It behaves like a number, but an
imaginary number!
Exercise 6. Prove this last statement.
We will denote this three-vector by ι. In the following we will exploit its properties and define a complex structure on our Clifford algebra Cl(V). We will identify Cl(V) with the algebra of complex quaternions (known also as biquaternions)
P.S. 25-10-24 While the comet Atlas is still in the sky:
Renan has said that truth is always rejected when it comes to a man for the first time, its evolution being as follows:First, we say the thing is rank heresy, and contrary to the Bible.Second, we say the matter really amounts to nothing, anyway.Third, we declare that we always believed it.
now now ->
ReplyDeletenow
(vi·gj) ->
(vi·wj)
(1|1) = 1;
some description needed
Fixed. Thanks.
DeleteWhat is the rank of:
ReplyDeletev = 1 + e12
What is the rank of:
w = 1+ e123
Is (v|w) zero?
Added the sentence: "then (f|g) is the determinant of the matrix of scalar products of the vectors: (vi·gj). We then extend the scalar product to the whole Λ(V) by linearity.
DeleteThis should suffice to get (v|w)=1.
"Added the sentence:"
DeleteCan't see.
Added Danger comment after "linearity".
Delete(vi·gj) ->
Delete(vi·wj)
"We then extend the scalar product ..."
DeleteWhat extend means? Is it sum of scalar products of particular blades products of the same rank?
Still:
What is the rank of:
v = 1 + e12
What is the rank of:
w = 1+ e123
They do not have definite ranks. We use linearity as follows:
Delete(1+e12|1+e123)=(1|1)+(1|e123)+(e12|1)+(e12|e123)=1+0+0+0=1.
"(vi·gj) ->
Delete(vi·wj)"
Strange. Have corrected and the correction disappeared. Corrected again. Thanks.
"For each element φ in Λ(V) we define the linear operator iφ ... ... we must have rank(ψ) = rank(φ)+rank(λ). Thus rank(iφψ) = rank(ψ) - rank(φ)"
DeleteWhat if φ doesn't have definte rank?
You are right. I have added the restriction of definite ranks. Thank you.
Delete"Have corrected and the correction disappeared."
DeleteIndeed.
now now ->
now
(1|1) = 1;
some description needed
the action of iφ decreases ->
Deleteφ in sub
we have (iv)2 = 0. ->
square?
Done. Or so I think. Thanks,
Deleteif u is orthogonal to v and to u ->
Deletew?
iu(v∧w∧z) = iu(v) w∧z - iu(w)v∧z + iu(z)v∧u ->
Deletew?
If v and w are orthogonal, i.e. if v·w = 0, then uv = u∧v = -vu. ->
Deletew?
- (e2)2(e2)2 = -1 ->
Delete- (e2)2(e3)2 = -1
of the algebra Cl(V)
DeleteProbably all fixed. Quite a marathon today! Thanks.
DeleteIf v and w are orthogonal, i.e. if v·w = 0, then uv = u∧v = -vu. ->
Deletew?
the squares of ei are now 1 ->
i superscript
And the life goes on. Thanks.
DeleteБезусловно всё это (внешняя алгебра, геометрическая алгебра) красиво, но в то же время стоит отметить, что это очень извилистый путь для построения алгебры комплексных матриц второго порядка. Вместе с тем, существует более короткий путь - через алгебру Ли векторных полей Киллинга 4-мерного пространства с евклидовой и нейтральной метрикой, которая совпадает с алгеброй Ли sl_2(C). Впрочем, физики предпочитают не замечать ни геометрическую алгебру, ни вышеуказанный изоморфизм. И они, наверно, правы, поскольку основания физики это скорее удел философствующих математиков или математических философов.
ReplyDeleteFell a bit behind with the exercises, so at this point just a light remark that even though the other anti-twin was also grounded as her counterpart, as far as their parents could tell, when being in close company they together formed doubly energetic pair illuminating the whole of the neighborhood, to the awe and shock of not only their realm denizens but also to residents in all the adjacent realms that might have been eavesdropping on this harmonious cosmic family.
ReplyDelete