Showing posts with label Gennady Shipov. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gennady Shipov. Show all posts

Friday, November 8, 2024

The Spin Chronicles (Part 10) - Dressing up the three involutions

 

This post is a continuation of The Spin Chronicles (Part 9): Matrix representation of Cl(V).

In Greek mythology, the three Graces—Aglaea, Euphrosyne, and Thalia—were goddesses of charm, beauty, and creativity. Let’s imagine these sisters lounging on an ancient hillside, as they engage in a playful but philosophical debate on the nature of reality.

Aglaea (the Grace of splendor and brilliance) takes a sip from her goblet of ambrosia and says, “Sisters, I’ll tell you what I believe to be the foundation of all things: matter itself. Look around us! The hills, the olive trees, the sky—everything is made of something. Without matter, there would be nothing to perceive or to enjoy. All reality begins with this.”

Euphrosyne (the Grace of joy and mirth) chuckles, swirling her own drink thoughtfully. “Dear Aglaea, that’s such a, well, grounded take! But think of the elegance behind things, not merely their substance. I argue that geometry is what truly underlies reality. The symmetry of the flowers, the curve of a river, even the shape of the stars in their constellations—geometry organizes matter, gives it purpose and beauty. It’s as if shapes themselves are the mold from which everything springs.”

Thalia, the muse of blooming and abundance, raises an eyebrow, already chuckling in anticipation of her own argument. “Oh, my beautiful, grounded, geometric sisters,” she teases. “How can you talk of matter and form without acknowledging the importance of information? The patterns, the codes, the language that organizes and defines everything we perceive—these are what really hold things together. Geometry and matter might give us the frame, but information is the artist with the brush, deciding what each piece will mean.”

Aglaea sets down her goblet, leaning forward with a glint in her eye. “So you think all things are simply... patterns of knowledge? A set of instructions that give order? But without matter, there’s nothing to know or organize.”

“True,” Euphrosyne nods. “And without geometry, that matter would be a chaotic jumble! It’s through geometry that we get structure, form, coherence.”

Thalia laughs, throwing her arms out as if embracing the universe. “And without information, both of those would be nothing but potential! You need a blueprint, a guide that says, ‘You, little particles, arrange yourselves like so to create something magnificent!’”

The sisters fall quiet, each musing over the others’ words. The sunset casts a golden light across their faces, and in that moment, they feel as if they've touched upon a truth that binds them all.

Finally, Aglaea speaks softly. “You know, there might be something greater than matter, geometry, or information alone. What if they’re all aspects of the same thing?”

“Yes,” Euphrosyne says, her eyes lighting up. “Something that encompasses both the structure of shapes, the substance of matter, and the language of patterns…”

Thalia smiles and whispers, “Geometric algebra.”

The three sisters exchange knowing looks, each filled with a newfound appreciation for the others’ ideas. They raise their goblets to the concept that unifies their philosophies, and in a toast to geometric algebra, they bask in the sweet realization that the foundation of everything is, indeed, a beautiful dance of shapes, substance, and meaning.

Thalia smiles and whispers, “Geometric algebra.”

The Clifford geometric algebra Cl(V) of a 3-dimensional Euclidean real vector space V, "our space", is naturally endowed with three involutions:

  • 1. The main automorphism π, changing the signs of the vectors.
  • 2. The main anti-automorphism   τ, reversing the order of multiplication in Cl(V).
  • 3. Their composition π∘τ = τ∘π, which we will call ν.

As they are born, they are "naked", as the three graces in this Raphael painting:

Raphael Three Graces

It is possible, but not easy to work with them. So, sometimes, it is useful to see them dressed, as it has been done by Botticelli:

Botticelli Three Graces

Today we will dress them in the matrix form. Using the notation of the previous post, we select an orthonormal basis in V and represent the basic vectors e1,e2,e3 by the Pauli matrices σ1, σ2, σ3, satisfying σ1σ2 = iσ3.

Pauli matrices

Dressing up τ  is not too difficult once we realize that Pauli matrices are Hermitian,  σi* = σi, and that, for Hermitian matrices X,Y, the Hermitian conjugation reverses the order (XY)* = YX. Thus, in the matrix representation of Cl(V) the main anti-automorphism τ is represented by the Hermitian conjugation. This was part of the Exercise in the previous post, and Bjab solved it right: for every X in Mat(2,C):

τ(X) = X*.

With π we need to be tricky. We need to reverse the signs of vectors, and vectors are represented by σi. Pauli matrices anti-commute σ1σ2 = -σ2σ1, etc, and their squares are I.  Thus σ2σ1σ2 = - σ1, and σ2σ3σ2 = - σ3, but, unfortunately, σ2σ2σ2 =  σ2. On the other hand, this time "fortunately", σ2 is the only Pauli matrix that is imaginary! Therefore adding the complex conjugation will do the job.

We try: for every X in Mat(2,C) we define

π(X) = complex_conjugate(σ2Xσ2) = σ2 complex_conjugate(X) σ2.

We check for X = I, for X = σi, for X = σ1σ2, etc,  for X = σ1σ2σ3 - it works! So, we managed to dress our π! Now dressing ν is easy. It is the composition of π and τ. We need to take

(σ2 complex_conjugate(X) σ2)* = σ2 (complex_conjugate(X))* σ2

But Hermitian conjugation is a composition of complex conjugation and matrix transpose! Therefore we have the answer:

ν(X) = σ2 XT σ2.

And so we managed to dress up all of our three graces. They can go out and work for us in a useful way! Which we will do in the following posts.

Thursday, June 29, 2023

The Physics of Non-Material World?

 Return to the First Question: Information and Quantum Future

Once we have a preliminary answer to the question “How come quantum?”, we can return now to the first question: “How come existence?”. It may have something to do with “information”. But what is information? How is it related to physics? And is information sufficient? What about organization?


If energy and momentum have their own separate dimensions, should not information and organization have dimensions of their own as well? And if so, what would they be, “real” or “imaginary”? Physical or “non-physical”? These are vague questions; therefore I need to be more precise.

Physics, in spite of quantum mechanics and its excursions into subjectivism, essentially deals with a material world exclusively. Not only does it not show any interest in a non-material reality, but it also often ridicules such ideas, except, perhaps, when physicists engage in a dialogue with theologians, but even then it is at most a “philosophy” and not physics. But must it be so?

The Non-Material World

Can physics be extended in such a way that it can deal with non-material world and still be objective rather than falling into the subjectivity sinkhole? It appears that some people are doing it and being allowed to get away with it.

Military Interest?

One example is the duo of Elizabeth Rauscher and Richard Amoroso. According to Wikipedia:

Elizabeth A. Rauscher (1937–2019) was an American physicist and parapsychologist. She was born in Berkeley, California on March 18, 1937.[1] She died on July 3, 2019 (aged 82). (...) She was a former researcher with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the Stanford Research Institute, and NASA

Richard Amoroso seems to be a Director of Noetic Advanced Studies Institute, has an education in psychology, and PhD in “Cosmology and Philosophy of Mind” – rather unusual domain, I’m sure you will notice. You may want to check their website to see what I mean.

Looking at one of their typical papers, with the title “The Physical Implications of Multidimensional Geometries and Measurement” I see that they are trying to include non-material reality by adding “imaginary dimensions” to those that are real. Tugging on this thread a little leads us to the fact that the US military seems to be interested in this kindof research by Prof. Rauscher:

Naval Surface Weapons Center, White Oak, 70-126, Silver Spring, MD 20910, 1982, R34-2- 0176 contract monitor E. Byrd, E.A. Rauscher, P.I. and W.L. Van Bise, P.I. Solving Maxwell’s equations in complex space relating to the space relating to the solutions to solitons and nonlinear Schrödinger equation and other nonlinear phenomena and the study of field phenomena.

What a surprise! Elizabeth Rauscher is also busy with “Modulating Brain Signals”:

E.A. Rauscher and W. Van Bise, Non-invasive Method and Apparatus for Modulating Brain Signals Through an External Magnetic or Electric Field to Reduce Pain, U.S. Patent Number 4,889,526, issued December 26, 1989.

But is it real, or is it a joke? I am inclined to think that it is, to a large extent, a joke, a red herring, so to say. Why do I think so? I am thinking that is a joke, because one of the works cited by Amoroso and Rauscher is “A Theory of Physical Vacuum” by G. I. Shipov, and this published monograph of Shipov is full of nonsense. I know it, because I checked it and also published a couple of  papers discussing Shipov's errors. I also had a private exchange with Shipov, and I did not change my opinion after this dialogue.

Nevertheless, with her military connections and funding, we may take it as a given that Rauscher and her colleagues are not doing what they do just for fun. They are searching, but, I guess, they have a really hard time finding the answer or they are not publishing the papers that do lead to the answer. The clue about what they are after is given in the last line of their paper. They say that just doubling the dimension, that is adding four imaginary dimensions to those four real dimensions of space and time, may not be enough. They want to go into twelve dimensions, not just eight.



Which leads us to Burkhard Heim.

"The theory of Heym has to be classified into the framework of a geometrization of physics. …” (STN INTERNATIONAL, 04 Jul 90).

Volume 3,  Structures of the physical world and its non-material side, was published in 1996 .

To be continued....

P.S.1. I pictured a rainbow, You held it in your hands, I had flashes, But you saw the plan. To my wife - The Whole of the Moon

The Whole of the Moon -  Lyrics.


P.S.2. New version of my notes on the conformal group.  Will add still more today



P.S.3. 
Only those thoughts are true the opposite of which is also
true in its own time and application; indisputable dogmas are
the most dangerous kind of falsehoods.

Sri Aurobindo

P.S.4 I know it's vanity, but it always feels nice. My old paper A. Jadczyk and K. Pilch, “Superspaces and Supersymmetries", Commun. Math. Phys. 78 (1981), 373–390, has been cited in a recent paper by R.R. Suszek (Warsaw), "Equivariant Cartan-Eilenberg supergerbes, the Kostelecký-Rabin defect and descent to the Rabin-Crane superorbifold"

Abstract: A concrete geometrisation scheme is proposed for the Green-Schwarz cocycles in the supersymmetric de Rham cohomology of the super-minkowskian spacetime, which determine standard super-σ-model dynamics of super-p-branes. The scheme yields higher-supergeometric structures with supersymmetry akin to those known from the un-graded setting - distinguished (Murray-type) p-gerbe objects in the category of Lie supergroups. These are shown to carry a canonical equivariant structure for the action of the discrete Kostelecký-Rabin subgroup of the target supersymmetry group on the target, and thus to resolve the `topology' of the corresponding Rabin-Crane soul superorbifold of the super-minkowskian spacetime. The equivariant structure is seen to effectively define a novel  σ-model of super-p-brane dynamics in the super-orbifold through the construction of the corresponding (gauge-)symmetry defect.

It has quite impressive graphics. Like for instance this one:

Figure 2. A Gσ-twisted field configuration x near a 2 → 1 junction υ of (oriented) edges ℓi,j , (i, j) ∈ {(1,2), (2,3), (1,3)} of a Gσ-jump defect. The edges separate patches ΣA, A ∈ {1,2,3} of the worldsheet, embedded by x in connected components of the metric bulk target space M and defined by the respective restrictions of the metric g and of the gerbe G. The field x maps the ℓi,j to the bi-brane worldvolume Q, from which it pulls back the respective restrictions of the gerbe bimodule Φ. Similarly, the junction υ is mapped to the component T (3) of the stratified inter-bi-brane worldvolume T , from which the 2-isomorphism φ is pulled back.

P.S.5. Recommended reading: Lies, damn lies and limited hangouts


P.S.6 30-06-23 12:20 . Suggested to me yesterday night by Laura, who, opposite to me,  remembers all she reads. From Umberto Eco, "The Name of the Rose"

P.S.7. 30-06-23 12:44 Another Umberto's Eco quote suggested to me by Laura. This time from Foucault's Pendulum:

"Amid all the nonsense there are some unimpeachable truths... I invite you to go and measure [an arbitrarily selected] kiosk. You will see that the length of the counter is one hundred and forty-nine centimeters—in other words, one hundred-billionth of the distance between the earth and the sun. The height at the rear, one hundred and seventy-six centimeters, divided by the width of the window, fifty-six centimeters, is 3.14. The height at the front is nineteen decimeters, equal, in other words, to the number of years of the Greek lunar cycle. The sum of the heights of the two front corners is one hundred and ninety times two plus one hundred and seventy-six times two, which equals seven hundred and thirty-two, the date of the victory at Poitiers. The thickness of the counter is 3.10 centimeters, and the width of the cornice of the window is 8.8 centimeters. Replacing the numbers before the decimals by the corresponding letters of the alphabet, we obtain C for ten and H for eight, or C10H8, which is the formula for naphthalene.

...With numbers you can do anything you like. Suppose I have the sacred number 9 and I want to get the number 1314, date of the execution of Jacques de Molay—a date dear to anyone who professes devotion to the Templar tradition of knighthood.

...Multiply nine by one hundred and forty-six, the fateful day of the destruction of Carthage. How did I arrive at this? I divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by two, by three, et cetera, until I found a satisfying date. I could also have divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by 6.28, the double of 3.14, and I would have got two hundred and nine. That is the year Attalus I, king of Pergamon, ascended the throne

You see? ...The universe is a great symphony of numerical correspondences... numbers and their symbolisms provide a path to special knowledge. But if the world, below and above, is a system of correspondences where tout se tient, it’s natural for the [lottery] kiosk and the pyramid, both works of man, to reproduce in their structure, unconsciously, the harmonies of the cosmos."


Eco, Umberto, Foucault’s Pendulum, (San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1988) pp. 288-289.

 P.S.8. 

P.S.9. 19:32 Managed to make the first image of the double infinity following the last Proposition in the file for a=1.5. Here it is

P.S.10 21:03 The same plot for a=5

P.S.11 01-07-23 19:41 Calculated the conformal structure on the infinity. It came out that it is  degenerated. While the lines connecting the two singular points have zero "length". There is no "time" there. Only space and light. I think.  Not sure about the interpretation. Will come out later on. Geometry on the circles (spheres) is standard Euclidean. Will write it down tomorrow.


Biolocation

  On Tuesday, December 23, Vlad Zhigalov (see e.g. here ) had a talk at the " Temporology " seminar hosted at Omsk.  He spoke abo...