Showing posts with label pencils of spheres. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pencils of spheres. Show all posts

Monday, May 19, 2025

Lie Sphere Geometry 16: Pencils of oriented spheres

 As a schoolboy I used pencils for drawing, mainly tanks and cars. Then I learned a little bit of perspective and tried to draw Greek temples and roads converting to a point on the horizon. 

Fascinated by pencils


It was just few years ago that I have learned about the concept pencils in geometry. I remember it was a paper by a Czech mathematician Metod Saniga,  "Pencils of Conics] a Means Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Arrow of Time":


Abstract: The paper aims at giving a sufficiently complex description of the theory of pencil!generated temporal dimensions in a projective plane over reals[ The exposition starts with a succinct outline of the mathematical formalism and goes on with introducing the definitions of pencil-time and pencil-space, both at the abstract (projective) and concrete (affine) levels. The structural properties of all possible types of temporal arrows are analyzed and based on symmetry principles, the uniqueness of that mimicking best the reality is justified. A profound connection between the character of different "ordinary" arrows and the number of spatial dimensions is revealed.


The subject interested me, but the math was too difficult at that time. Now it is time to return to this subject.

Definition 16.1. Two different oriented nonpoint spheres in S3 are in oriented contact if they have a common point xS3 , they are tangent to each other at x, and if they also have the same orientation defining unit normal vector n at x.

Definition 16.2. Given a point xS3 , a pencil of oriented spheres at x is the set of all oriented spheres in pairwise oriented contact at x.

Let us now examine these concepts. For r ∈ [0, 2π) and m a unit vector in R4 , the equation of an oriented sphere Sr(m) is

m · x = cos(r),     x · x = 1,                 (16.1)

while the normal unit vector n at x is (for a non-point sphere)

n(x) = (m − cos(r)x) / sin(r).                 (16.2)

Suppose we have two spheres Sr(m) and Sr'(m')  in contact at some point x0 . Let n0 denote the common unit normal vector at the common point x0 . Thus

n0 = (m − cos(r)x0)/sin(r) = (m' − cos(r')x0)/sin(r').                 (16.3)

It follows that

m = sin(r)n0 + cos(r)x0 ,                 (16.4)

m'= sin(r')n0 + cos(r')x0 .                 (16.5)

For a nonpoint sphere r≠ 0 and r≠ π, so that | cos(r)| < 1. Therefore, given x ∈ Sr(m), the unit vectors m and x in (16.1) are linearly independent – they span a two-dimensional subspace of R4 . Any vector tangent to the sphere at x is orthogonal to these two vectors. So the tangent space to the sphere at x is the orthogonal complement of m and x. But from (16.2) it follows that the subspace spanned by m and x is the same as the subspace spanned by mutually orthogonal unit vectors n and x. Therefore the spheres Sr(m) and Sr'(m'), having the same x0 and n0 , are automatically tangent to each other at x0 . The requirement of them being tangent to each other in Definition 16.1 is therefore redundant.

Substituting (16.4) into (16.1) we see that the spheres of the pencil defined by x0 and n0 are intersections of planes with the sphere S3

(sin(r)n0 + cos(r)x0 ) · x = cos(r),     x · x = 1.                 (16.6)

As an illustration Fig. 16.1 shows the several circles from the pencil of oriented circles for x0 = e2 and n0 = e3 . In Fig. 16.1 we have used only the values of r in (0, π].


Figure 16.1: Pencil of oriented circles for x 0 = e 2 and n 0 = e 3 , r = 2kπ/10, k = 1, . . . , 10.


This is because the spheres Sr(m) and Sr+π mod 2π (−m) are the same. We added the point sphere r = π, which reduces to the point x0 , because it naturally ‘wants’ to be included.

In the next chapter we will study the representation of pencils of oriented spheres in Q - that is the space to which, as we will see, they naturally belong, and the acquire a definite geometrical and physical meaning.



Biolocation

  On Tuesday, December 23, Vlad Zhigalov (see e.g. here ) had a talk at the " Temporology " seminar hosted at Omsk.  He spoke abo...