On Tuesday, December 23, Vlad Zhigalov (see e.g. here) had a talk at the "Temporology" seminar hosted at Omsk. He spoke about “biolocation” (or “dowsing”) – experimental research and theoretical attempts to understand it. To summarize his message: there is a substantial body of experimental data, both old and new, but much more research is needed before any clear picture emerges.
There are “devices” that act as sources of certain “wave-like” phenomena, and there are patents for both sources and detectors, but it is still unknown when and how these devices actually work. There is a manifest need for a human “operator” in these experiments, yet it remains entirely unclear what, exactly, humans detect and by what mechanism they do so. In the discussion after the talk, A. G. Parkhomov recalled his old hypothesis that perhaps our spines, with their periodic vertebral structure, play an essential role in this “detection” process.
There is no single accepted theory. G. Shipov, of course, insists that
everything is due to “torsion fields”. V. Mirkin claims that it is all
“unipolar aether”. According to E. Egorov it is all "vector potential" and its carriers (which I like). Other researchers will blame "quantum entanglement". Whether animals can sense these “radiations”
is unknown. How all this relates to “pathogenic zones” is also unknown.
Why the positions of stars might correlate with radioactive decay rates
remains equally obscure.
One thing, however, is perfectly clear: why research in these directions
is often branded as “pseudo-science” or “wrong science”. It is because
such research potentially threatens the comfort and authority of
mainstream science [1].
Refereences
[1] METHOD OF BIOLOCATION STUDIES ACCURACY INCREASING. Vladimir Igorevich Nesterov, Curr Top Neurol Psychiatr Relat Discip. Vol XX, No. 3-4, December 2012
