The Allure of Myths
We humans are funny creatures. We like to think of ourselves as rational beings, guided by facts and truths, but let's be honest: we thrive on myths. Why? Because truth, for all its nobility, is often dull. Myths, on the other hand, are thrilling! They're the juicy stories that give us a little buzz, a sweet shot of adrenaline. Suddenly, the meaning of life doesn't seem so pressing—there's excitement to be had! Something to believe in! Whether it's faith in religion or faith in science, we cling to our myths like a lifeline. Yes, even science, the beacon of truth and logic, is not immune to the lure of a good myth.
The Quantum Quagmire
Take quantum entanglement, for example. Sounds fancy, right? Like something straight out of a sci-fi movie. But at its core, it's just an ordinary, mundane property of complex quantum systems. Nothing to write home about. Yet, this humble phenomenon has been glorified, named, and mythologized to the point where you can't attend a dinner party without someone dropping "quantum entanglement" like it's the latest celebrity gossip. And heaven forbid you don't nod sagely and pretend to understand.
I had a reader, a physicist no less, who wrote to me just the other day. Now, this guy doesn't even dabble in quantum theory, but he felt compelled to chime in:
A Physicist’s Perspective
"I think Bell's article should be known, regardless of one's sympathies. It is simply always good to look at any issue from the broadest perspective, to know all the important aspects. Bell's work is undoubtedly something important in the whole discussion of quantum entanglement. You can disagree with its message—but even then, you should know it, or at least know something about it.
In short: general culture requires knowledge of myths, regardless of whether one is involved in these myths or not."
Hard to argue with that, right? It's the intellectual equivalent of saying, "You should really read Shakespeare, even if you prefer binge-watching reality TV."
The Truth, The Whole Truth, and Nothing But...
But here's where it gets interesting. My physicist friend, for all his wisdom, doesn't seem too concerned with the truth. And that puzzles me. Why is it that people think we should be well-versed in myths, able to toss them around like party favors, yet so few are interested in the cold, hard truth? It's as if truth is less important, a party crasher that ruins all the fun. And maybe that's exactly it. The truth has a nasty habit of popping our mythological bubbles, leaving us suspended in a void with nothing but reality to hold onto. And who wants that?
The Daredevils of Truth
There are, of course, those rare souls who dare to seek the truth, come what may. These fearless fighters, these daredevils of reality, are few and far between. They’re often ridiculed, ostracized, and sometimes even lose their jobs. Society doesn't take kindly to truth-tellers. They're like modern-day Fausts, selling their souls for a glimpse of the real deal. Why? Because our society is infected with a nasty little bug called narcissism. And one of the telltale signs of this disease? A preference for myths over truth. "I know!" people declare, and what follows is a string of their favorite myths, served up with a side of self-assuredness.
The Myth of Us
So, why do we cling to myths? Perhaps it's because they give us something to hold onto, something to believe in when the truth feels too slippery, too uncertain. Or maybe it's just because myths are more fun. After all, who wants to be the party pooper who ruins a good story with facts? But every now and then, it's worth asking ourselves: What are we really chasing? The thrill of a good myth, or the solid ground of truth? The answer, my friends, might just be another myth we tell ourselves.
I was watching the video "The impossible experiment"
Similar experiments with distant influence have been described in 2017 in a paper by Serge Kernbach: "Replication experiment on distant influence on biological organisms conducted in 1986", published in Issue #E2 of International Journal of Unconventional Science. The Introduction has this paragraph:
"... modern experiments on quantum communication [4] confirm his vision and approach. In general, the quantum interpretation of observed phenomena, in particular the phenomenon of entanglement inmacroscopic systems, has now received numerous experimental confirmations [5], [6], [7], [8]. Therefore, in the above mentioned polemic, modern works confirm the correctness of A.E.Akimov, although with a slightly different interpretation.".
"Slightly different" means moving from "torsion fields" of Akimov and Shipov to "quantum entaglement" - whatever it means! From attempts to find the truth to myths. How can we explain anything using quantum theory, which itself desperately needs an "explanation"?
The discussion under the Youtube video has an interesting comment by "technomirfuture2228". I quote this comment in extenso:
Guys, this is not just quantum entanglement, this is hyperphysics! You work with hyperfield effects.
What are hyperfields?
These are the same physical fields, but existing in more than 4 dimensions, in other words, they are hyperprojections of the field onto our 3D world, some of them can be called informational - for example, the field of Consciousness, it does not transfer force interaction, but information, and this happens instantly, and at the physical level this manifests itself in the synchronization of the states of molecules, atoms and even macro-objects.
Vladislav is right about something, if we consider our world as a dense vesal world, then it should have a more subtle prototype that contains information about everything that happens at the material level.
Studying quantum fields, it became clear that all elementary particles are not independent, isolated objects, but rather constantly interacting field clots with the field space surrounding them, which we call the 4-dimensional space-time continuum, but this is not limited to this!!!
Time, like space, has 3 dimensions, it is not linear. A person only feels the 4th dimension, but cannot see.
It follows from this that we perceive the world in an extremely limited way, we live in 3 dimensions on which the shadow of the 4th is cast.
Phantoms, ghosts, plasmoids cannot always be explained by standard optical or psychic phenomena; these are objects not from our 3-dimensional world, these are objects of hyperspace that were able to penetrate our plane of existence.
The hierarchy of dimensions is built not only from top to bottom - from the source to the most basic level, but also vice versa from the basic level to the source, and this process is the evolution of the Universe and spirit.
Spirit is the primary idea of the world, this is Logos in its broadest understanding, this initial world is very simplified, everything exists potentially in it, in the form of information or primary quantum potentials, in order for the world to begin to develop, the realization of this potential must occur, in other words, descending projection and division into levels, densities, matter and energy, elementary particles, protons and neutrons, electrons, atoms, molecules, etc.
Only in addition to our physical. plan, there are many levels or subtle planes of existence where there are their own worlds and their own laws, and my assumptions regarding the fact that everything in our world is connected are confirmed by scientific research, I am very glad that now is the time to look at these ideas in a new way and move from theoretical, to their experimental implementation, your experiments are very valuable for science and society,
I think the accumulated knowledge will help humanity reach a new level of knowledge not only of the world around them, but also of themselves.
This is a poetic vision. How to make real science out of this vision?
P.S. 30-08-24 18:09 And what kind of science should it be?
Hitomi Akamatsu, a Japanese remote viewer, was given the difficult task to visualize the creation of the Higgs-Boson event at the LHC. She was found dead not too long after the session.
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/P34DGYluD4E?t=1443
"When I saw those particles or existences, I saw they are perfectly lined up and each particle seems to be communicating with each other. Also, they have a distance between them, but there is such a perfection as in distance, and ratios, and space and time and perfectly harmonic, like harmonic resonance and I almost felt like I was listening to an orchestra of music. It was so beautiful."
"When I saw the energetic movement of the beings, they are drawing like a fractal coming over and over interacting and expanding and growing and creating. Then, I thought it must be like Fibonacci."
"At first, when I saw images on my blackboard, I felt they are living organisms as they have consciousness in them. Therefore, at first, I just thought that they can be neural networks in the brain. Then, I looked into it and started seeing the beautiful strings of energy that are colorful almost like a rainbow of shaft energies which are interacting and intercommunicating with each other. And then, as I observed them, they responded to me and they even knew that I was looking at them."
The world is full of weird people!
Delete